|


Advantages of STT® System relative to conventional
reactor methods include the following:
Rapid and Uniform Mixing – The high shear flow that
is responsible for the mixing within the STT® System is much more
energetic than that achievable in a conventional volume-based mixer,
resulting in mixing at the molecular level. This more vigorous type of
mixing leads to faster reaction processes and higher yields. In addition,
the flowing format results in less waste due to production failures.
The system can process gases, viscous liquids, and solids, and is suitable
for mixed-phase reactions. Use of our STT® System system can also
reduce solvent and catalyst requirements.
Economic Optimization – The
STT® System flowing film format
approach permits an unprecedented level of control of reactions, resulting
in the more efficient and less costly manufacture of products. The operating
parameters of the STT® System can be adjusted to match those of the
process being run, including matching the STT® System’s mixing
speed with the reaction rate, control-ling the stoichiometry of the reaction
through the proper introduction of reactants, adjusting the flow pattern
of reactants in the STT® System with the reaction mechanism, setting
residence time in the STT® System with the reaction time, and balancing
the heat transfer characteristics of the STT® System with the reaction
isotherm.
Precise Temperature Control – The two dimensional
format of the STT® System enables precise temperature control. This
differs from a conventional, three dimensional environment of a volume-based
system
where considerable temperature variations between one part of the mixing
vessel and another may exist due to distance from the heating source.
Precise temperature control increases yield and leads to better product
quality control and less likelihood of batch loss.
Scalability and Commercialization – The
STT® System is highly
scalable because important reaction parameters of the STT® System
that affect rate of mixing and heat transfer, such as the flow rate and
the gap between the rotor and stator, are not altered by increasing the
size of the system. Thus, the transition of the chemical process from
pilot scale to production scale systems is seamless. We have demonstrated
the scale-up from research bench to pilot plant levels in a single day.
Dynamic
Monitoring -
The STT® System allows for the progress of the chemical reaction
to be monitored continuously and in real time. If a problem occurs, a
process can be halted and the problem corrected with a minimal loss of
valuable reagents. In contrast, conventional vol-ume-based systems require
a significant degree of additional effort, expenditure and complexity
to attain and maintain a continuous oversight of reactions. As such,
a production problem generally leads to a loss of most or all of the
reagents since they are all combined at one time.
Size – Our commercial scale STT® Systems
and larger, derived complete STT® Production Units, are small in
size but can produce the same amount of product as much larger conventional
systems and production units respectively. This process intensification
is possible due to the increase in reaction rates that we achieve from
the intense shear generated in the STT® System.
Independent STT®System Variable
Control
The STT® System allows for the isolation and independent
control of reaction variables. The following is a list of reactor and
reaction variables and how they have been used to engineer a faster,
more selective and more complete transesterification reaction.
Shear Rate – This
is responsible for the improved reaction rate and is the driving force
of the technology. Shear Rate and Residence Time are independent. Shear
Rate is measured in s-1. Typical shear rate values are 30,000/sec to
70,000/sec but higher or lower values are possible.
Residence Time – Residence Time is controlled by
reactor gap size, reactor working volume, and feed rate of reactants.
Again, Residence Time is independent of Shear Rate.
Temperature – The
STT® System is able to maintain temperature
as well as to rapidly add or remove large amounts of heat to control
the temperature of the reaction. Several of the Company’s heat
exchangers are patent pending and designed specifically to give the STT® React
system tight temperature control.
Pressure – The STT® System
can be run under pressure (up to 600 PSIG depending on the configuration
and choice of seals), open to
the atmosphere, or under vacuum. There is some flexibility in where gasses
are added or removed from the reaction stream.
Port positioning and Use – The
STT® System system be-haves
in a plug flow manner, so multiple reactants can be introduced to the
system as the reactions progress, if desired.
Reaction Initiation – Initiation
of the reaction can be controlled by preheating the reactants and shearing
one reactant into the other
at a side port. This ensures the reactants cannot begin to react before
they are mixed in the STT® System. Temperature sensitive reactants
can also be mixed at a lower temperature in the STT® Reactor and
then be allowed to rapidly reach the reaction temperature due to shear
heating and heat transfer from external and/or internal heat exchangers.
Feed
Rate – The STT® System permits easy metering of multiple
feeds into the system with varying miscibility and phases (solid, liquid,
gas, slurries) – more so than could be tolerated in a traditional
stirred tank reactor (STR) or plug flow reactor (PFR) system. For example,
one can ensure that a particular hydrogen or oxygen to reactant ratio
is obtained so the reaction is not run reagent rich or lean versus the
desired stoichiometry. This capability has broad implications in selectivity.
Another advantage is the ease of mixing or blending of compo-nents with
great differences in viscosity where other technologies struggle to achieve
homogeneity under these conditions.
Types of feed – A broad range
of feed materials is possible. Any mixture of gas, liquid and solid suspension;
density; and miscibility
can be accommodated as long as there is an adequate way of getting the
feed to the reactor in a homogeneous state and particle size of solids
is kept below one fourth of the gap dimension.
Reactor Positioning – Vertical
or horizontal positioning can lead to different results depending on
the reaction. In reactions where a
gas is a reagent or a byproduct, a horizontal position is best if the
desire is to keep the gas emulsified. In reactions where solids are present,
such as the use of a heterogeneous catalyst, a horizontal reaction is
best for keeping them suspended. Vertical positioning can enhance off-gassing
when a gas byproduct is generated and separation is desired to promote
reaction completion.
Working Volume – The working volume is the
volume between the rotor and stator where the reaction actually occurs.
It is determined from
the last feed entry port to the product exit port. This is distinguished
from the total volume of the STT® System cavity which includes the
volume from where the first reactant enters the reactor to the last reactant
port (this can be as little as a few milliliters) and the space that
exists between the product exit port and the seal (minor volume). The
working and total volumes are a function of the gap size (or annulus)
and change as the size of the rotor is changed.
Materials of Construction – Typically
the materials of construction are SS 316L, Hastelloy® C or titanium.
Other materials are available based on the chemistry of the reaction
and reactants..
Application Areas
STT® technology creates significant increases in reaction
rates where momentum, heat or mass transfer are issues. The Applications
Table on the reverse side provides a sampling of initial un-optimized
reaction results when the STT® technology is applied in specific
application areas. Comparative examples are provided that illustrate
the difference between the performance of the STT® reactor and a
batch process run under similar conditions.
Reaction rates, yield, and/or selectivity can be enhanced
further when optimized reactor conditions have been empirically determined.
A significant benefit of the STT® technology is that optimization
can be determined on the bench scale (Magellan® series) which easily
scales through the pilot production (Innovator® series) and then
into the commercial scale.
| Some of the advantages that the STT® reactor technology
brings include: |
 |
Rate enhancement |
 |
Improved conversion |
 |
Selectivity enhancement |
 |
Reduced batch cycle time |
 |
Improved temperature and reaction environment control |
 |
Reduced catalyst consumption and solvent use |
 |
Reaction of normally immiscible materials |
 |
Mixing of materials with large relative viscosities |
 |
Improved safety in handling toxic and explosive materials |
 |
Rapid and efficient cleaning |
 |
Small reactor foot print compared to conventional
reactors |
Other Applications
For those interested in more complex chemistry please request our Pharma,
Agricultural and Specialty Chemical Applications Table for some examples
of how the STT® reactor technology can benefit you.
Examples
| Type of Reaction |
Examples |
Chemical Synthesis
|
| • |
Selective Oxidation – Rate and selectivity improvement
that is reaction dependent. Depending on the goals, rate is sacrificed
for selectivity to an intermediate oxidation product. |
| • |
Selective Hydrogenation – Rate improvement with
reduced catalyst
use. |
| • |
Esterification – Rate increases of up to 300x over typical
batch
reaction. |
| • |
Transesterification – Similar to or better than Esterification. |
| • |
Saponification – Peanut oil to soap in 11 seconds, ~300x
rate increase. |
| • |
Hydrosilylation – Rate increases of 500x seem to be
normal. |
| • |
Condensation – 7x improvement in conversion over batch
reaction. |
| • |
Ionic Liquids – Low temperature and pressure solvancy
with low
vapor pressure solvancy. |
|
Polymer Synthesis and
Modification |
| • |
Polyesters – Rate improved
similar to that seen for esterification. |
| • |
Polyamides – Similar improvements
expected as with Polyesters. |
| • |
Polyolefins – 10x faster and
at lower temperatures than in a batch reaction. |
| • |
Polystyrene – Quantitative
polymerization in 90 seconds. |
| • |
Polyacrylates – 90+ % conversions
in < 20 seconds. |
| • |
Immiscible monomers processing. |
| • |
Immiscible polymer alloy blending. |
| • |
Depolymerization – recycling
as an environmental benefit. |
|
| Solids Synthesis |
| • |
Fine particle synthesis – Particle
size control by Shear Rate and Residence Time (~3 seconds). |
| • |
Sol gels – Technology is well
suited for this application. |
| • |
Also well suited for complex inorganic
materials for high performance
applications where uniform product with specific morphology is required. |
|
Mixing
Blending
Compounding
Emulsification
Suspensions |
| • |
Rapid blending of components. |
| • |
Improved mixing/blending of immiscible
components. |
| • |
Blending of high and low viscosity
components. |
| • |
Blending of additives/stabilizers
into a polymer. |
| • |
Rapid pH adjustment especially good
for viscous solutions. |
| • |
Blending of polymers to form alloy
mixtures. |
| • |
Emulsion stability improvement with
lower emulsifier use. |
|
Biocatalysts and
Bioprocessing |
| • |
Use of enzymes or whole cells in
synthesis – dispersing active materials to improve activity
per unit volume with low shear rates (e.g. yeast fermentation
of molasses decreased fermentation time by ~40%). |
| • |
Anaerobic and aerobic synthesis. |
| • |
Waste processing applications. |
| • |
Lyse cells efficiently – utilizing
high shear rates to lyse. |
|
| Extractions |
| • |
Natural product extractions into
immiscible fluid phase. |
| • |
Chemical purification – impurity
removal. |
| • |
Extract products from lysed cells. |
| • |
Separation and distillation related
applications being developed. |
|
|